![]() Only in that 16/44 has always sounded glassy, or edgy, to me and there's a form of distortion present that happens when there are high and low frequencies together. It does eat up headroom in a mixing situation but I don't usually mind. If it's lower than 192, sampling it at 192 won't make any difference. Ofc course this all depends on what sample rate everything on the vinyl was recorded and mixed at. When recording anything you want to start with the highest amount of information captured as possible. Our minds preform complex calculations behind the subconscious all the time, so even just giving someone the extra air movement of a higher or lower frequency matters IMO even if you can't hear it. But I maintain that there's vibes and a subconscious relationship with feeling the frequencies move through the air beyond the range of human hearing. ![]() Honestly as someone who's recorded at all sample and bit rates, 44.1 16 definitely sounds nice and clean no doubt about it.Īs someone coming from a recording background I can say in my experience that the extra fidelity of the sampled waveform at 192 is something only dogs, dolphins, and bats would actually hear. The input gauge will often also show you if the signal has peaked, but clicks and pops of your record makes this less reliable as a sole source. You can typically see easily if the waveform peaks a lot. For the same reason, inspect the recording afterwards. Make sure you have a little headroom for those sudden bursts of audio (distortion due to peaked signals doesn't sound nice). ![]() The volume levels vary between records, and especially acoustic recordings may show great variety. Adjust the input gain individually for each record. You'll be surprised what noises are picked up through vibrations. Keep quiet when recording, no sound in the room and don't walk around in the room. Maybe everybody knows this, but it took some time for me to actually realize the impact in sound quality of only a slightly unlevel TT. Make sure your turntable is 100% leveled. Clean the records thoroughly beforehand, has a HUGE impact on sound! I tried 24bits/96Khz to test the difference, but in all honesty they sounded equal to me (and I consider myself to have a very good set of ears! :-O). I know most other here use way higher bitrates and sample rates, but I have to admit I couldn't be happier with the rips I have. I have to say, the quality of the rips were astounding, and I could burn them right to CDs for my old moms pleasure. Recorded using Audacity, no post processing, 16bit 44.1Khz. Inexpensive, very common and works right out of the box on both PC and Mac. Rega P3 with upgrades: Tangospinner subplatter, Tangospinner feet, Michel Tecnoweight, Rega Exact pickup, and external PSUįor A/D I bought a Focusrite Scarlett 2in1 USB soundcard. In other words, my milage isn't great but the results I got were awesome - to the point I tend to listen to the digital recordings at work, in secret :) I ripped a few records for my mother's birthday, stuff from her youth she had had in the attic. I guess you're basically looking at studio equipment if you want that level of quality. When I investigated this some time ago, the cost to buy a really good dedicated "stand-alone" ADC that can do 192k 24bit or better was, shall I say, prohibitive. Play back the copy versus the vinyl and it's not difficult to pick out which is the copy.īut if I'm sharing a file with a buyer - so, something I am selling, there's no point in sampling above 48k since that's the max for an MP3. The result, like a tape, sounds very "coloured" which is why I make that comparison. You can actually see the noise from the electronics causing spikes when there's no other input. It has to be "left alone" while doing this or something else may compete for processor time and the resulting file then has drop-outs.Īt 192k 16bit (as good as it can do) I'd say it's about level with a very good cassette tape recording but no better than that. I have my turntable in the "office room" and record using my PC and Audacity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |